Black, White and Brown: 50 Years of School Desegregation?
By IRWIN KRAMER The Daily Record May 17, 2004
As we mark the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision to
desegregate public schools, the lawyer that won the case and later made history
as its first African American justice might find little to celebrate in the
classrooms of his old Baltimore high school.
Thurgood Marshall’s victory in Brown v. Board of Education was a
crowning achievement for this Frederick Douglas High School graduate, but
achievement at the school has dwindled in the fifty years that followed.
According to test scores released by the Maryland Department of Education, less
than eight percent of tenth graders at Justice Marshall’s alma mater
attained minimal proficiency in reading and the school is one of 62 that are
slated for state "restructuring."
Even the few students who are able to read the Brown decision may
wonder whether it had any real impact in eliminating what Chief Justice Earl
Warren described as "separate" and "inherently unequal" schools. Of the 1,312
students at Frederick Douglas, all but seven are black. Rather than make college
plans, nearly half of all city students fail to graduate and those that do may
never catch up to those taking classes in wealthier suburban schools just across
the county line.
This is hardly what Thurgood Marshall envisioned as a 45-year old civil
rights lawyer fighting for equal educational opportunities for children of all
races. Though he won the legal battle unanimously on May 17, 1954, a
half-century of experience in Baltimore City and other urban school districts
has taught us that it takes more than the votes of nine Supreme Court justices
to eliminate segregation and inequality in our society.
Despite 50 years of "integration," we have returned to school systems which
are separate and far from equal. In Baltimore City and in many other school
districts, the flight of middle class families to the suburbs has left urban
schools with an anemic tax base and strapped resources to handle the special
needs of impoverished children. Facing the challenges of poverty, these students
are left to languish in classrooms which appear to be as racially segregated as
they were a half-century ago.
Sadly, the concept of "separate, but equal" schools is no longer a relic of
the past. It has become a goal for the future. Today, cities battle to maintain
the autonomy of their school districts while fighting for educational
opportunities that would place their students on a par with those in richer,
whiter suburbs. The new educational goal in the new millennium: Separate, but
equal, schools.
Ironically, in striving for "equality" within urban school districts that are
segregated by city borders, we are only serving to perpetuate the "inherently
unequal" system that the Supreme Court tried to eliminate in Brown. As
Chief Justice Warren observed, a diverse student body "is a principle instrument
in awakening the child to cultural values, in preparing him for later
professional training, and in helping him to adjust normally to his
environment." Unless we break down the borders that divide our students, Warren
believed it "doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in
life."
This is certainly true for students at two Maryland schools sharing the name
of the nation’s greatest champion of educational rights: "Thurgood Marshall
Middle School," in Baltimore City and in Prince George’s County, are both slated
for state "restructuring."
The free legal information on the 50th Anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Brown vs. Board of Education, Thurgood Marshall, problems in the city school system, separate but equal rights to education, Baltimore City Public Schools, Maryland Department of Education, racial inequality, reading proficiency test scores, integration and illiteracy is not intended to constitute legal advice. Readers are advised to check legalities and seek the legal representation of competent Maryland attorneys and civil lawyers to protect their legal rights. The slogans, High-Speed Access to Legal Action, Legal Advice, Legal Counsel, Legal Protection, State & Federal Courts, Dispute & Conflict Resolution, Probate Protection, Legal News, Legal Training & Seminars, and the substantial equivalent thereof are service marks of Kramer & Connolly. |